Posts Tagged ‘resolutions’

2012 = big changes at the NCSU Insect Museum

Thursday, January 12th, 2012

This year will be one of transition for the Insect Museum, as there will be a lot of turnover in personnel:

  • Matt Yoder has been instrumental in helping us set up and refine our specimen database, and he’s been an incredible colleague and mentor to our students. He is moving soon to the Species File project, and though we’ll always be collaborators we will miss having him around the Museum! Amy Bader, one of our museum technicians is joining him.
  • Two students are scheduled to defend their masters this spring: Andrew Ernst and Trish Mullins, and another student, Steve Turner, may also wrap up this year.
  • Katja Seltmann left us earlier this month and now is helping to coordinate one of the first TCN projects, Plants, Herbivores and Parasitoids: A Model System for the Study of Tri-Trophic Associations, at the American Museum of Natural History.
  • Two of us are moving to Penn State in July: István Mikó and me, Andy Deans. I will serve as the new director of the Frost Entomological Museum. More on this later, as it’s obviously big change for the Insect Museum.

It’ll be an exciting year, nonetheless, as we are ready to begin our contribution to the tritrophic interactions TCN mentioned above. That means digitize, digitize, digitize. And we’re on track to finish the drawer-scanning component of our prior BRC grant. We have almost 2,000 drawers uploaded to GigaPan! Scarabs and buprestids are coming up soon, so there will be some real eye candy. With all of this in mind, here are our 2012 resolutions:

  • Update the bee classification we use to curate specimens. Seems like an obvious task for us, given that we have a world class bee collection, the director is a hymenopterist, and we have a student (paid by the museum grant) who LOVES bees. We’ll move Anthophoridae and Meliponidae to their respective places (under Apidae) and do some substantial relabeling and reorganizing. It’s also relevant to our NSF BRC grant, which runs out in August.
  • Finish GigaPanning the collection. We have maybe 600 or so drawers left to image, and it’s taking awhile because we’re also using this necessary handling as an excuse to inject some expansion space into the collection. The remaining drawers are challenging, but we have the time and experience now to polish them off.
  • Maintain our efforts to monitor humidity, pest strips, and ethanol levels in the collection. Seems like this shouldn’t be a resolution, but I find it useful to place it here as a metric to use in our year-end self-evaluation.
  • Stay communicative. With the North Carolina Insect of the Week likely moving to a more erratic schedule we need to make sure we publish other news and observations to this blog and to Twitter. Maybe that sounds silly, but it’s fun to share our latest discoveries and other activities – keeps everyone aware and on their toes! The weekly insect morphology post should help with that.
  • Organize a smooth transition. With most of the Deans lab leaving, it’s important that we get organized about equipment, funding (especially the TCN project), and, perhaps most importantly, our digital resources (how the database is set up, how to access the museum website, etc. – it’s a bit of a digital hodgepodge right now, involving multiple servers). Assuming a new director will be joining the Museum in the not-too-distant future we want to make sure that person can make a seamless transition.

2011 resolutions – how did we do?

Tuesday, January 10th, 2012

Happy (quite belated) new year! December 31 came and went, as did the NSF DEB pre-proposal deadline (January 9!). We’ve been slammed with personnel changes, courses, meetings, manuscripts, and proposals these last few months, but we definitely want to make time to revisit our resolutions from last year, acknowledge our accomplishments in 2011, and then make a few resolutions for 2012. First, how did we do with respect to our 2011 goals?

  1. Finish profiling the collection – We’d profiled our pinned specimens in 2010 and aspired in 2011 to establish protocols for profiling our ethanol-preserved and slide-mounted collections – and then, of course, to actually profile these collections. So, how did we do? Our newest team member, Heather Campbell-Melvin, did a stellar job of evaluating our wet collection, a summary of which was presented at ECN last November. Watch this blog for a thorough account of our metrics. As for the slides … we haven’t touched them yet, primarily due to resource constraints. It’s the collection of least concern for us, based on our anecdotal profiling, so I am comfortable putting it off until 2012. Overall I’m going to declare this resolution a success.
  2. Monitor humidity and pest traps twice a month and publish results to the Web – After a quick rethinking of our workflow we chose to monitor the pests only once a month. Other than that change we did indeed manage to establish a rhythm and maintain it throughout the year. Our results are available on the calendar. This resolution was a success, and we’ll carry it into to 2012.
  3. Thoroughly inventory, label, and track Museum equipment and supplies – We have quite a supply of insect collecting gear, bought from a variety of sources. Some of this gear needs to be available for other parties within the department, including gung-ho students and instructors for Entomology classes. The rest of the gear is dedicated to Insect Museum missions. In 2011 we wanted to get organized about this equipment (a spreadsheet inventory) and track our loans of this gear. We did manage accomplish these goals, and I’d call this a success.
  4. Database Aphididae – Substantial progress was made towards this goal, mainly because we had world aphid experts visit us for an epic slide-scanning event (Bob Foottit and Eric Maw, from the CNC). More on this later, but our aphid slides have been scanned and are in the process of being processed. Huge success here, though we couldn’t have done it without help from our Canadian friends!
  5. Portage data to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility – As I said last year, we’ve been close for a long time to getting this done. We’re basically ready, in that our database has been configured to export data in the right format, but we’re not sharing yet. Too many distractions late in 2011. So, I have to declare this resolution a failure, though it probably (hopefully) won’t be a failure for very long.
  6. Offer another 52 North Carolina Insects of the Week – Astounding success! These posts are my favorite, as they force me to look at specimens and dive into the literature to learn about insects I don’t usually get exposed to. Our 104th will be this Friday, which marks exactly two years’ worth of North Carolina insects. I expect the posts to continue after that but to be much more erratic, as we shift gears and blog about other topics (more soon).

Up next: accolades, big changes, and resolutions for 2012.

2011 Insect Museum resolutions

Monday, January 10th, 2011

Okay, we’re almost two weeks into the new year now, so I need to get something out about our resolutions for 2011. Here we go:

  1. Finish profiling the collection – We’ve done our pinned specimens, and now it’s time to evaluate our ethanol-preserved and slide-mounted collections. Upon completing this task we’ll have established benchmarks that facilitate rigorous monitoring of improvement. My prediction is that the slides will fare very well – they’re largely curated at the species-level (most of our slides are Clyde Smith’s aphids), stored horizontally, in Canada balsam (not Hoyer’s!), etc. Our ethanol-preserved arthropods … well, let’s see. Overall they’re in great shape, but we don’t have standardized vials / standardized stoppers / standardized racks. Profiling this collection might give us the data we need to justify a redirection of resources and time.
  2. Monitor humidity twice a month and publish results to the Web – We need to establish a rhythm, so that when it gets crazy in the fall—and it does get crazy—we can still remember to collect these data. We’ll post the raw data on our calendar.
  3. Monitor pest strips twice a month and publish results to the Web – Ditto here. Though our collection has never shown any signs of pests (we are well-protected physically and chemically) we should remain vigilant. It’s a good habit that costs us almost no time. Same drill, with raw data published to the calendar.
  4. Thoroughly inventory, label, and track Museum equipment and supplies – We have quite a supply of insect collecting gear—Malaise traps, Winkler extractors, Berlese funnels, sweep nets, spreading boards, etc.—bought from a variety of sources. Some of this gear needs to be available for other parties within the department, including gung-ho students and instructors for Entomology classes. The rest of the gear is dedicated to Insect Museum missions. We’ve played fast and loose with these instruments for too long; it’s time to get organized. We’ll establish a system whereby we can track gear that’s been loaned, prevent certain gear from leaving the Museum in the wrong hands, and prioritize items that need replenishing.
  5. Database Aphididae – We said we’d do it in our BRC grant, and we’ve made headway on a slide-scanning workflow. It’s time to implement it.
  6. Portage data to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility – Again, it’s a mission of our Museum to make specimen data available to anyone who needs it. Many of the species we’re databasing (Diapheromera carolina Scudder, 1901) have NO records at GBIF (Diapheromera carolina Scudder, 1901 species page). Our contributions will be significant. We’ve been close for a long time to getting this done. Expect this to be completed imminently.
  7. Offer another 52 North Carolina Insects of the Week – What can I say? We’re gluttons for fun and for punishment. We’ll choose species based on whimsy and reader requests!

Of course we have numerous personal or lab-specific resolutions as well, but these seven are the big ones for the Museum as a whole. Off the record I have a couple Museum-related resolutions to deal with bulk samples—deaccession some, sort others—and to clean out our chemical cabinet. I’ll save those topics for another post later in the year.

2010 in review – last year’s resolutions

Tuesday, January 4th, 2011

Here’s what we proposed to do in 2010, as outlined in my post from December 30, 2009:

  1. Address [perceived] humidity problems. In 2009 we implemented irregular monitoring of relative humidity inside the Insect Museum and inside our cabinets, mainly because Gardner Hall, in my experiences as a museum curator, lacks adequate climate control. During several summer days in 2009 we measured RH values of 60%+ inside the collection, which is a major concern for pest outbreaks, including fungi. So for 2010 we purchased a new, highly accurate monitor and began recording RH more rigorously (at least at first). During the hottest, muggiest days of 2010 the RH inside our cabinets never climbed higher than 33% and was never higher than about 50% in other parts of the room. Success!
  2. Post regular pest monitoring results. We were fairly consistent in posting results here or through our Google calendar up through September … but alas, our efforts in the waning months were sporadic at best. Conclusion – we failed to consistently share our pest monitoring results (goes for humidity monitoring as well, in fact, especially after August). Failure.
  3. Database Coccinellidae and Aphididae. We proposed to do this as part of our BRC grant, and while we have only just begun our slide databasing (i.e., the aphid collection largely remains analog). We’ve accomplished far more in the specimen-digitization arena than I anticipated, though, thanks in a very large part to our data entry expert, Kelly Dew. Success!
  4. Write North Carolina insect-of-the-week blog posts. In our BRC proposal we offered to initiate a biweekly, “insect of the fortnight” blog series that highlights the species native to North Carolina. Well, we outdid ourselves. Nine Insect Museum researchers, plus another eight ENT 502 students, crafted a full 52 pages that celebrated North Carolina insects. The exemplars were chosen somewhat haphazardly, with an overarching intention to represent species across the hexapod phylogeny. A couple orders got short shrift (apologies to Ephemeroptera and Archaeognatha), but our coverage ended up being broad, and the species pages ended up being quite informative. For me, this was a great excuse to deeply explore our collection and its representation of North Carolina’s fauna, and the process added both anecdotal and real data we can incorporate into our profiling scheme. This exercise also forced us to sit down every week and database specimens (mostly) outside of our target taxa. One aspect that all of us, I think, underestimated was exactly how much time it takes to write up an accurate and content-rich species page, complete with images and specimen data. Some posts took more than five fun-filled hours to complete. Can we sustain this series through 2011? I think we should! Success!
  5. Profile the entire collection and make results accessible. We did manage to profile the entire collection. We did not, however, publish the results anywhere. I’ll fix that this week, hopefully. Success pending publication. Success!
  6. No more legacy data. We promised to stop adding purely analog specimens to the research collection in 2010. I am happy to report that all specimens accessioned last year were databased and uniquely identified. Their metadata will soon be available through GBIF! Success!
  7. Establish a consistent, weekly sorting session to deal with bulk and receiving material. Wednesday nights, from 5:00-9:00pm – if you weren’t there you were square. Well … maybe it didn’t happen every Wednesday, but we made a decent effort. Numerous bulk samples were sorted, and the majority of our Hymenoptera receiving was sorted to family or below. We still have a lot of work to do, but 2010 was an excellent start. Success!
  8. Add 5,000 Hymenoptera specimens to the research collection. I’m still trying to sort this one out. We just might have contributed that many hymenopterans to the research collection, but most are from bulk samples that belong to other institutions (i.e., loans of exotic species, from which we can likely keep many duplicates). We’ve certainly sorted out enough Hymenoptera to process, but they aren’t quite mounted and determined to genus yet. I need another couple weeks to call this one. Success pending more information.

Some room for improvement and some lessons for next year, but overall we made significant improvements to our collections and our outreach potential. Up next – resolutions for 2011!

2010 in review – the highlights

Tuesday, January 4th, 2011

At the end of every year I like to reiterate the highlights, revisit our resolutions, assess progress, and outline goals for the coming year. Here’s my list of what went right at the Insect Museum in 2010, a year that by almost every metric was one of our best:

  • After a fair bit of press the Hexapod Haiku Challenge receives >500 entries, from six continents. I count that as a success beyond my wildest dreams. Here are the 2010 bests in show: poet >13 years old, poet <13 years old.
  • Along these lines, Katja Seltmann / Irene Moon forged numerous new connections between museum science and the broader arts community by a) projecting an insect-themed video in downtown Raleigh, b) developing an insect-oriented radio show at WFMU (e.g., see Irene Moon’s Insect Corner in these playlists: Art Irritating Life, Psychic Octopus, Art for Nothing), c) delivering an exciting science-art talk in the departmental seminar series, d) opening a dialog between the Insect Museum and the Gregg Museum of Art & Design (more details soon), and e) by installing a mini-gallery outside the Insect Museum, where artists can show their entomological art on a rotating basis.
  • One of our research images was selected as part of a juried art exhibit at the Carnegie Mellon Natural History Museum. Wow!
  • We grew our Museum blogger community by adding several authors: Andrew Ernst, Trish Mullins, Awma Rinchhuanawma, Katja Seltmann, Matt Yoder, Barb Sharanowski, and Isaac Winkler. Thanks for adding such compelling content!
  • On that note, I should acknowledge that Wednesday, December 8 was the single greatest day for the Insect Museum blog, thanks to Isaac’s post on Mormotomyia, a rare and unusual fly from Africa. After some ace investigation work, following a hot lead, Isaac was able to publish a piece about this exciting fly before any other blog or news site got wind of the discovery. His post triggered a 100-fold increase in the amount of traffic we typically receive in a day: >4600 hits!
  • Our infrastructure improvements, research, and outreach efforts were highlighted in a report by a team of prominent US Senators! Talk about exposure!
  • We successfully published 52 insect of the week posts, the last 15 or so of which were formalized in such a way that we can (eventually) contribute that content to the Encyclopedia of Life and other websites – killing at least four birds with one stone, so to speak. I’ll elaborate on this in the next post.
  • A third of the drawers our pinned insect collection have been imaged and published in a way that facilitates annotation, dialog, and collection improvement.
  • We databased almost 27,000 Museum specimens, minimally for taxonomic determination (OTU for us) and collecting event data. Our focus for 2010 was on our bee and ladybird beetle collection and so the majority of these specimens are Megachilidae and Coccinellidae.
  • We published eight manuscripts that span the breadth of systematic research, from species revisions, to higher-level phylogenetics, to comparative morphology, and biodiversity informatics.
  • Our Facebook fan club grew from 47 to 247. Thanks for the recognition!

In short, there was a LOT of activity at the Insect Museum in 2010. I’m sure that 2011 will also be chock-a-block with productivity. Up next, a quick evaluation of last year’s resolutions and then a list of goals for 2011.

UPDATE: Another event that probably falls under the category of 2010 Museum highlights was our display revitalization project. I never did blog the final results as a whole, but the new displays are simply amazing and certainly a lot more informative than the old ones! Thanks to everyone involved!

resolutions for 2010

Wednesday, December 30th, 2009

Ok, so we didn’t quite meet those resolutions for 2009. What are our resolutions for 2010?

  1. Take care of the humidity issue. Persistent monitoring and reporting are key to resolving this potential problem. We’ll also look into dehumidifying strategies – e.g., remove fan vents, install some dehumidifiers – before spring hits in 2010. This should be an easy problem to solve.
  2. Post regular pest monitoring results to our calendar. A follow-up on last year’s resolution. No excuses this year, we’ll get it done.
  3. Database the Coccinellidae and Aphidae. We have the tools and student-power we need, and this one of the tasks outlined in our BRC proposal. No sweat.
  4. Write North Carolina insect-of-the-week (yes, weekly!) blog posts. OK, this resolution is ambitious. We will cover one North Carolina insect species per week by posting information on its natural history, what our research collection holds for that taxon, how to find and preserve specimens, and, of course, photos of what these insects look like. I’d also love to offer a KML file of our NCSU specimens (you could view them in Google Earth!), alongside each post, but I bet we won’t be able to do that for all species. We’ve lined up a series of these blog posts already (check this blog on Friday mornings), thanks to the hard work of my ENT 502 students from last semester. This will definitely be fun!
  5. Profile the entire collection. We’ll follow McGinley’s (1989) classic profiling methodology or use the modified INHS system, but somehow, some way we will have the collection profiled in 2010 – the earlier the better. We’ll also post the results in a very public way, similar to this page by the Natural History Museum at the University of Oslo.
  6. No more legacy data. All new data will be captured electronically from the very beginning (in the lot stage), and all prepared specimens will get unique IDs. We’ll know – in real time – how many specimens we’re adding, rather than having to go back and count them at the end of the year.
  7. Establish a consistent weekly sorting/pinning/labeling session. We tried desperately last semester to meet weekly, but our schedules were never quite in sync. I’m confident that we can find our rhythm this year, though, and that we will finally process the ever-growing collection of bulk samples in our freezer. Which leads us again to our final resolution…
  8. Add 5,000 Hymenoptera specimens to the research collection. Either from bulk (mounted and sorted at least to family) or from unsorted pinned material (in which case specimens will be determined at least to genus).

I think those are reasonable and certainly laudable resolutions for 2010. We would definitely appreciate any input you might have regarding these efforts, and we wish you all the very best in the new year!